Playing multiple videos: Anemone Player vs VLC vs OBS

If you need to play multiple videos at once, Anemone Player is purpose-built for it, VLC can do it by running several separate windows, and OBS Studio can do it by treating each video as a scene source. Each takes a different amount of setup, and each trades off differently on cost and capability — here's the honest breakdown.

At a glance

Feature Anemone Player VLC OBS Studio
Native multi-video grid layouts Yes — built-in presets No — manual windows Manual scene positioning
Frame-accurate sync across sources No No No
Images and video mixed in one layout Yes Not in the same window Yes, via Image Sources
Independent per-monitor windows Yes — assign each screen Manual, one instance each Manual, one Projector each
Streaming / recording to an audience No — not built for it No Yes — this is its job
Price $30/year or $79 lifetime Free Free
Learning curve Low — pick a grid, drag in files Low per window, tedious at scale Steep — scenes, sources, projectors
Anemone Player layout picker compared to manual VLC and OBS multi-video setups

Anemone Player

Built specifically to display multiple videos and images at once. You pick a grid, drag sources into the panels, and it saves the arrangement — no rebuilding it every time. The honest weaknesses: it isn't free after the trial, it doesn't stream or record anything, and it has no cross-machine networking for very large installations.

VLC (multiple windows)

Free, open-source, and installed on more PCs than any other player — hard to beat for playing a single video reliably. For multiple videos, you're opening a new instance per video and positioning each window by hand; nothing ties them together, so closing one, moving one, or restarting the PC means redoing the whole arrangement. VLC can display images too, but only one source per window — mixing images and video across a shared grid means running even more separate windows.

OBS Studio (scenes)

OBS is genuinely excellent software — for streaming and recording. Compositing multiple video and image sources into a scene works, and the Fullscreen Projector trick can push that scene to a physical monitor. But it's a real workaround: no grid presets, no saved playlist or shuffle across sources, and a scenes/sources/projectors model with a learning curve that's overkill if all you want is a video playing on a screen. If you actually need to stream or record what's playing, though, OBS is the right tool — Anemone doesn't do that at all.

See the difference yourself, free

30 days free, no credit card required. Get your license key instantly.

Frequently asked questions

Is VLC good enough for playing multiple videos?

For two or three videos briefly, yes — it's free and reliable. Past that it gets painful: every window is positioned by hand, nothing remembers the arrangement, and there's no shared playlist or shuffle across the windows.

Can OBS actually display video to a screen, not just stream it?

Yes, using the Fullscreen Projector feature to push a scene to a physical display. It works, but it's a workaround — OBS's editing canvas is designed for compositing a stream or recording, not for being the on-screen player itself.

Is Anemone Player free?

It's free to download and try for 30 days with full features. After the trial it requires a paid license — $30/year or $79 one-time — unlike VLC and OBS, which are free and open-source forever.

Which one should I use for streaming to Twitch or YouTube?

OBS Studio. Streaming and recording is literally what it's built for. Anemone isn't a streaming tool and has no broadcast output — it's built to display content locally, not send it anywhere.

Which one should I use for a permanent video wall or signage display?

Anemone Player. It's built for exactly that: saved grid layouts, drag-and-drop sources, and unattended operation — the setup VLC and OBS both require you to rebuild by hand every time.